New Ad Shows President Obama’s Broken Health Care Promises, In His Own Words

by on Wednesday, December 23, 2009 at 1:31 pm in Healthcare, Politics

The two most controversial aspects of the recently passed Senate health care bill include the absence of a public option, and a mandate whereby the public will be required with penalty — to be enforced by the IRS — to purchase health insurance policies from the private, for-profit, health insurance industry; policies which may very well provide inadequate coverage, and may include unaffordable deductibles, co-pays, or premiums (those with qualifying income can receive government subsidies towards private insurance policy premiums).  The progressive community has largely blasted the bill as a giveaway to the health insurance industry off the backs of American citizens.

A new national poll, by Research 2000, revealed that only 33% of Americans favor such a mandate without a public option and a medicare buy-in, and 56% of Americans oppose such a bill.

Yesterday, President Obama defended the bill to the Washington Post by making the erroneous claim, “I didn’t campaign on the public option.”  Liberal blog, Think Progress, responded by posting a series of instances where Obama had in fact promised his supporters the public option:

  • In the 2008 Obama-Biden health care plan on the campaign’s website, candidate Obama promised that “any American will have the opportunity to enroll in [a] new public plan.” [2008]
  • During a speech at the American Medical Association, President Obama told thousands of doctors that one of the plans included in the new health insurance exchanges “needs to be a public option that will give people a broader range of choices and inject competition into the health care market.” [6/15/09]
  • While speaking to the nation during his weekly address, the President said that “any plan” he signs “must include…a public option.” [7/17/09]
  • During a conference call with progressive bloggers, the President said he continues “to believe that a robust public option would be the best way to go.” [7/20/09]
  • Obama told NBC’s David Gregory that a public option “should be a part of this [health care bill],” while rebuking claims that the plan was “dead.” [9/20/09]

The Progressive Change Campaign Committee upped the ante by unveiling a new ad showing President Barack Obama stating the following:

“Any plan I sign must include an insurance exchange, including a public option to increase competition and keep insurance companies honest.”

“If a mandate was the solution, we could try that to solve homelessness by mandating everybody buy a house.  The reason they don’t have a house is  they don’t have the money.”

WATCH:

YouTube Preview Image

They plan on running the ad in Washington, DC and in Wisconsin — home of Senator Russ Feingold (D-WI), whom they hope can still be persuaded to drop his support for any bill without a public option.

UPDATE:

Here’s a clip on MSNBC’s ‘Countdown,’ hosted by Lawrence O’Donnell, showing Obama during the campaign telling groups who cared about the issue, like Health Care For America NOW!, that he supported a public health insurance plan.

It includes a clip of Obama campaigning to a Planned Parenthood event on July 17, 2007 where he outlines to the audience his health care reform proposal:

“We’re going to set up a public plan that all persons and all women can access if they don’t have health insurance.  It will be a plan that will provide all essential services, including reproductive services.”

It also includes another clip of Obama in the make or break state of Iowa speaking to the Editorial Board of the Des Moines Register, the Summer before the Caucuses:

We’re providing subsidies to people who can’t afford health insurance.  They have the option of buying into the government plan, or they can go out on the private market, but we won’t give the subsidy to pay for a plan that does not abide by these basic criteria.

And another clip from the Heartland Presidential Forum on December 1, 2007 — just one month before the Iowa Caucuses — where Obama is shown telling the crowd the following:

If I were designing a system from scratch, I would probably move more in the direction of a single payer plan, but what we have to do right now, because of people like Deirdre and her daughter, is I want to move to make sure that everybody’s got coverage as quickly as possible.  And I believe that what that means is we expand SCHIP, it means that we extend eligibility for some of the government programs that we have, we set up a government program as I’ve described that everybody can buy into.

We will not completely eliminate the private market, because half of the people are still getting insurance from the private marketplace, but we will give them a choice so that if they feel as if they’re being price gauged they are gonna have a legitimate alternative that they can access.

It should be health insurance they can count on.  And the notion that the private marketplace can take care of that is just not true.

WATCH:

YouTube Preview Image

UPDATE II:

I went digging around in my old Organizing For America / Barack Obama Campaign material, and here’s what I dug up:  “President Obama’s Plan for Health Reform,” where it reads:

IF YOU DON’T HAVE INSURANCE

Quality, Affordable Choices for All Americans

  • Creates a new insurance marketplace — the Exchange — that allows people without insurance and small businesses to compare plans and buy insurance at competitive prices.
  • Provides new tax credits to help people buy insurance.
  • Provides small businesses tax credits and affordable options for covering employees.
  • Offers a public health insurance option to provide the uninsured and those who can’t find affordable coverage with a real choice.
  • Immediately offers new, low-cost coverage through a national “high risk” pool to protect people with preexisting conditions from financial ruin until the new Exchange is created.

Here’s the document: 

Tags:

4 Comments

  • | 96#
    GeorgeOrwell
    Dec 25th, 2009 at 11:54 am

    Who is the God of this nation ?

    Many liberal and some conservative proponents (appear) to be reluctant to admit; either out of shear mindlessness, or complete willful disregard for rational thinking, that this nation is systematically being taken over by a faceless enemy. The LACK of consideration for the rights of the people (“Life, Liberty Pursuit of Happiness”) is so brazen it’s numbing. This bill/bills is a trojan horse primed for the elimination of civil liberties and rights even God .. how so ? The idea of mandatory submission that EVERYONE be required to subscribe to medicinal means alone precludes those who choose to rely on God alone for their source of health and well being. One need look no further than the Children of Israel fleeing Egypt, the three Hebrew Prophets (Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego) cast into the furnace, Daniel, Jesus, eventually Saul/ Paul all who lived in occupied countries refusing to subscribe to human means and ways for their health and well being. We hear the all these new physiological terms bantered about i.e. “wellness” as if to invent new ways of soliciting the peoples consent to subscribe medicinal means alone .. Where does medicine come from ? Well its safe to say that pretty much everything we see in the world primarily comes from the ground i.e. DIRT..( pardon the sarcasm) .. the problems plaguing this country or even the world are scientific and theological. Is it any coincidence that The United States Of America mirrors an ironic resemblance to the ideal of the “New Jerusalem” which would deliver men from tyranny and oppression from the lowest to the highest degree
    If we believe that the government is acting on behalf of the peoples best interest and replacing reliance on their government for their health and well being instead of God it would appear (on no uncertain terms) that God is unequivocally being pushed out of the picture altogether.

    Split hairs over what this president did or didn’t say is important yes but what is the bigger picture ? .. People are being duped into compromising so called “security” for freedom. How much security do you believe the government can provide ? Do you feel safer at night because you believe your government appears to be in control ? Do you see a government in control ?

    The “Left” appears to be using “SCARE TACTICS” from the standpoint of if we don’t do this… etc etc etc .. the “Right” argues if we do do this etc etc etc .. whom are the people to believe ?? The “Rights” credibility went into the toilet when choosing style over substance and conceding core principles for what seemed to be politically expedient. The early pioneers were self reliant, today it appears we expect the government to solve all problems like children who appear not to be willing to accept responsibility .. Sound familiar ? think of the children of Israel worshipping the golden calf after Moses came down from the mountain top. ..so now we have laws being written ad-infinitum to compensate for the publics apparent moral turpitude. How many more laws need to be written when the core ones in place aren’t being enforced or admonished ?
    God is here but we have been blinded to the man that we are being told to pay no attention to behind the curtain. The all powerful OZ will grant you what ever you wish ..

    Big Brother is here .. the war is upon us …
    New Speak: ttyl

    • | 97#
      Stan
      Dec 25th, 2009 at 12:18 pm

      I respectfully disagree. This bill is a trojan horse to enrich entrenched interests, i.e. the health insurance industry.

      The bill mandates that ALL Americans MUST purchase expensive ‘for-profit’ private health insurance — or face penalties to be enforced by the IRS. These plans may have unaffordable deductibles, or co-pays, and may not even offer adequate coverage. If the premiums are too expensive you may qualify for the government to subsidize the price gauging plans, but ONLY if your income qualifies you for that subsidy. That means the American taxpayer will be enriching the health insurance industry for price gauging the American people.

      This is about entrenched interests bribing our politicians to legislate in a way that doubles, triples their profits, off the backs of American citizens. Health insurance company stocks have gone up 25-30% since the Senate bill emerged as the giveaway it did.

      This is NOT about government control, or religion, this is about corporate greed, and bribes, and corruption of our elected officials. All off the backs of struggling Americans.

  • Jun 8th, 2011 at 8:55 pm

    According to a recent poll, only eighty-two percent of Democrats would re-elect Obama if they could vote today. They voted for hope and ended up with change.

  • Jul 22nd, 2011 at 6:27 pm

    Just how would a person determine almost all this out there about this matter? I loved reading through this, Sad have got to pay a visit to other webpages on your site without delay.

Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. Obama’s Biggest Broken Promise: The One On Special Interests « AlterPolitics - Progressive Blog For Politics, World Issues, Arts & Entertainment
  2. Is The Coffee Party Shilling For The DNC? « AlterPolitics - Progressive Blog For Politics, World Issues, Arts & Entertainment
  3. The Most Effective Way To Protest At The Ballot Box « AlterPolitics - Progressive Blog For Politics, World Issues, Arts & Entertainment
  4. Health Insurers: Without Individual Mandate, We’ll Jack Up Your Rates! « AlterPolitics - Progressive Blog For Politics, World Issues, Arts & Entertainment
  5. When Compromise Means Undermining The Logical Solutions To Our Most Serious Problems « AlterPolitics - Progressive Blog For Politics, World Issues, Arts & Entertainment